From jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Sat May 24 04:52:32 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 24 May 2003 04:52:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web41906.mail.yahoo.com ([66.218.93.157]) by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 19JXZZ-0008PV-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 24 May 2003 04:52:25 -0700 Message-ID: <20030524115154.4213.qmail@web41906.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.69.5.103] by web41906.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 24 May 2003 04:51:54 PDT Date: Sat, 24 May 2003 04:51:54 -0700 (PDT) From: Jorge "Llambías" Subject: [lojban] Re: emotions To: lojban-list@lojban.org In-Reply-To: <200305232351.57421.phma@webjockey.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-archive-position: 5375 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list la pier cusku di'e > As far as I can see, voting can't be used to weed out definitions - once > someone has voted that {parji} means "parasite", the word is in the > dictionary and the only way to get it out is to edit the TeX file. The keyword "parasite" could be voted for another word, in which case I think {parji} won't appear in the English to Lojban part. Perhaps every new word could have an "exclude" alternative so that they can be voted against as well. Then people could choose whether they want to print the dictionary with or without those words that have been voted out. Or, there could be an option to include or exclude certain kind of words (exptal gismu, or compound cmavo, or whatever) when generating a dictionary. mu'o mi'e xorxes __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. http://search.yahoo.com