From rspeer@MIT.EDU Sun May 25 00:32:22 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 25 May 2003 00:32:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pacific-carrier-annex.mit.edu ([18.7.21.83]) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19JpzJ-0002hQ-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 25 May 2003 00:32:13 -0700 Received: from central-city-carrier-station.mit.edu (CENTRAL-CITY-CARRIER-STATION.MIT.EDU [18.7.7.72]) by pacific-carrier-annex.mit.edu (8.12.4/8.9.2) with ESMTP id h4P7WBgR021441 for ; Sun, 25 May 2003 03:32:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from melbourne-city-street.mit.edu (MELBOURNE-CITY-STREET.MIT.EDU [18.7.21.86]) by central-city-carrier-station.mit.edu (8.12.4/8.9.2) with ESMTP id h4P7WBGr004226 for ; Sun, 25 May 2003 03:32:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from torg.mit.edu (TORG.MIT.EDU [18.243.1.228]) ) by melbourne-city-street.mit.edu (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id h4P7WAU8002882 for ; Sun, 25 May 2003 03:32:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rob by torg.mit.edu with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 19JpzE-00056A-00 for ; Sun, 25 May 2003 03:32:08 -0400 Date: Sun, 25 May 2003 03:32:08 -0400 From: Rob Speer To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: emotions Message-ID: <20030525073208.GA19583@mit.edu> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20030524152229.GA98255@allusion.net> <7FC7B245-8DD5-11D7-AC97-003065D4EC72@optushome.com.au> <200305240751.29472.phma@webjockey.net> <20030524152229.GA98255@allusion.net> <5.2.0.9.0.20030524131439.06b68880@pop.east.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.0.20030524131439.06b68880@pop.east.cox.net> X-Is-It-Not-Nifty: www.sluggy.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i X-archive-position: 5387 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rspeer@MIT.EDU Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 01:16:29PM -0400, Robert LeChevalier wrote: > Why is it important that infrequently used jargon words have very short > forms? (glances at lau, tei, and foi) -- mu'o mi'e rab.spir