From a.rosta@lycos.co.uk Mon May 26 04:49:11 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 26 May 2003 04:49:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lmsmtp04.st1.spray.net ([212.78.202.114]) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19KGTQ-0000F3-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 26 May 2003 04:49:04 -0700 Received: from oemcomputer (host213-121-66-67.surfport24.v21.co.uk [213.121.66.67]) by lmsmtp04.st1.spray.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22E6E47E88 for ; Mon, 26 May 2003 13:48:29 +0200 (MEST) From: "And Rosta" To: Subject: [lojban] Re: emotions Date: Mon, 26 May 2003 12:48:27 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <20030525231259.GA10234@allusion.net> X-archive-position: 5400 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: a.rosta@lycos.co.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list Jordan: > > cmavo is not a syntactic class, it is a morphological class > > It is also a class of syntactic classes. It doesn't strike me as a natural class of syntactic classes, since the only thing that those syntactic classes have in common is that they all have the morphological property of being expressed by cmavo. --And.