From pnewton@gmx.de Tue May 27 01:59:37 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 27 May 2003 01:59:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from postman1.arcor-online.net ([151.189.0.187] helo=postman.arcor.de) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19KaIt-0003Gr-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 27 May 2003 01:59:31 -0700 Received: from hamwpne1 (pc1-oxfd1-5-cust27.oxfd.cable.ntl.com [62.254.134.27]) (authenticated bits=0) by postman.arcor.de (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h4R8xJQ1025306 for ; Tue, 27 May 2003 10:59:25 +0200 (MEST) From: "Philip Newton" Organization: datenrevision GmbH & Co. OHG To: lojban-list@lojban.org Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 10:58:35 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [lojban] Re: 2 more mistakes in refgram Message-ID: <3ED344DB.18289.5451EB@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <1dd.a6a1c3c.2c04261b@wmconnect.com> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v4.02a) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-description: Mail message body X-archive-position: 5438 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: pnewton@gmx.de Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On 26 May 2003 at 22:23, MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com wrote: > 15.10) /fi'i ro zvati ko pinxe pa ckafi/fi'i ro zvati .i ko pinxe pa ckafi/ I don't think that's a mistake. Both sentences appear fine to me; you can use COI + brivla at the beginning of a sentence. mu'o mi'e .filip. -- filip.niutyn.