From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Tue May 27 12:19:55 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 27 May 2003 12:19:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 19KjzA-0004PT-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 27 May 2003 12:19:48 -0700 Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 12:19:48 -0700 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: bpfk vs jbovlaste Message-ID: <20030527191948.GD21909@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <0D6B1A8E-8DD3-11D7-AC97-003065D4EC72@optushome.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0D6B1A8E-8DD3-11D7-AC97-003065D4EC72@optushome.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 5456 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 08:32:43PM +1000, Nick Nicholas wrote: > But jbovlaste was not initially intended to be an arm of the bpfk, and > the bpfk is nowhere near undertaking any review of it. Furthermore, > those seditious, baseline-undermining souls who have been entering > exptal gismu have nonetheless had the courtesy to clearly label them as > such Actually, the program labels them as such. No choice is given. Repeating what I said in the other thread: jbovlaste will be revised to disallow experimental words in the dictionary output. -Robin -- Me: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. "but I'm not stupid and people are not stupid who think samely with me" -- from an actual, real, non-spam mail sent to webmaster@lojban.org http://www.lojban.org/ *** .i cimo'o prali .ui