From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Tue May 27 12:25:33 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 27 May 2003 12:25:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 19Kk4c-0004T6-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 27 May 2003 12:25:26 -0700 Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 12:25:26 -0700 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: bpfk vs jbovlaste Message-ID: <20030527192526.GE21909@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <0D6B1A8E-8DD3-11D7-AC97-003065D4EC72@optushome.com.au> <5.2.0.9.0.20030524121758.06856b90@pop.east.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.0.20030524121758.06856b90@pop.east.cox.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 5457 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 12:51:10PM -0400, Robert LeChevalier wrote: > If you use the search engine for either "parasite" or "parji", > what come up gives no indication that the word is non-standard, > and that is the way I suspect that most people will use a > dictionary. He's got a point. Jay, could you try to fix this? Also, it would be lovely if the words themselves on the search page actually linked to the main jbovlaste entry for the word in question. -Robin -- Me: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. "but I'm not stupid and people are not stupid who think samely with me" -- from an actual, real, non-spam mail sent to webmaster@lojban.org http://www.lojban.org/ *** .i cimo'o prali .ui