From a.rosta@lycos.co.uk Wed May 28 18:27:22 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 28 May 2003 18:27:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lmsmtp04.st1.spray.net ([212.78.202.114]) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19LCCJ-00038r-00 for lojban-en@lojban.org; Wed, 28 May 2003 18:27:15 -0700 Received: from oemcomputer (host81-7-61-208.surfport24.v21.co.uk [81.7.61.208]) by lmsmtp04.st1.spray.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24E42491E3 for ; Thu, 29 May 2003 03:26:43 +0200 (MEST) From: "And Rosta" To: Subject: [lojban] FYI: lojban-en Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 02:26:42 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <20030529005117.GB30084@digitalkingdom.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 Importance: Normal X-archive-position: 5496 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: a.rosta@lycos.co.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list regarding creating lojban-ru@lojban.org (i.e. discussion in Russian): > From: Robin Lee Powell [mailto:rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org] > On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 01:40:31AM +0100, And Rosta wrote: > > > Love to. We already have lojban-fr and lojban-es > > > > That makes me wonder whether the main list should be renamed > > lojban-en. It would surely be a considerable inconvenience to > > many, but perhaps politically a positive move? > > Done. Or, at least, lojban-en@lojban.org will now do what you > expect > > (Behold the power of e-mail aliases 8)