From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Sat May 31 00:07:07 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 31 May 2003 00:07:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 19M0SC-0003Bz-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 31 May 2003 00:07:00 -0700 Date: Sat, 31 May 2003 00:07:00 -0700 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: ISO 639-2 request Message-ID: <20030531070700.GI1647@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20030530153358.GN4034@skunk.reutershealth.com> <20030531041140.GJ32032@ccil.org> <20030531065652.GA56285@allusion.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030531065652.GA56285@allusion.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 5531 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 01:56:52AM -0500, Jordan DeLong wrote: > On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 12:11:40AM -0400, John Cowan wrote: > > Craig scripsit: > > > > > >perhaps 300 who have some level of interest in the language. > > > >Lojban has > > > > > > Huh. The last statistics I heard were way higher than that. > > > What's the subscriptions on the mailing lists up to? > > > > Better safe than sorry. > > Then why not be safe about the fluency estimates also? > > My count on fluency is a nice big 0. Mine too. -Robin -- Me: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. "but I'm not stupid and people are not stupid who think samely with me" -- from an actual, real, non-spam mail sent to webmaster@lojban.org http://www.lojban.org/ *** .i cimo'o prali .ui