From pnewton@gmx.de Thu Jun 05 10:32:45 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 05 Jun 2003 10:32:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from postman1.arcor-online.net ([151.189.0.187] helo=postman.arcor.de) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19NybM-0001g6-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 05 Jun 2003 10:32:36 -0700 Received: from hamwpne1 (pc1-oxfd1-5-cust27.oxfd.cable.ntl.com [62.254.134.27]) (authenticated bits=0) by postman.arcor.de (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h55HWXCi018557 for ; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 19:32:34 +0200 (MEST) From: "Philip Newton" Organization: datenrevision GmbH & Co. OHG To: lojban-list@lojban.org Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 19:32:32 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [lojban] Re: [Archivist] Volts? Message-ID: <3EDF9AD0.9719.1EB50E9@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <20030605171510.GS12377@digitalkingdom.org> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v4.02a) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-description: Mail message body X-archive-position: 5611 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: pnewton@gmx.de Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On 5 Jun 2003 at 10:15, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > Why is there a gismu for amps but not volts? > > I thought the gismu were intended to include all (or at least most > of) the standard SI units? volt is not basic SI; it's a derived unit, while amp is basic (IIRC). volt is W/A, i.e. (kg m^2) / (A s^3). mu'o mi'e .filip. -- filip.niutyn.