From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Wed Jul 02 14:36:20 2003
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 02 Jul 2003 14:36:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12)
	id 19XpGt-0007Vx-00
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 02 Jul 2003 14:36:11 -0700
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 14:36:11 -0700
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] {Archivist} Intention of gunma?
Message-ID: <20030702213610.GH3306@digitalkingdom.org>
Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
X-archive-position: 5798
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

Was the intention of the definition of gunma to allow things like:

    le cecmu cu gunma mi

Or do we need to do things like

    le cecmu cu gunma lu'i mi ce da

?

In other words, is the x2 of gunma an individual or a set or either?

-Robin

-- 
Me: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/  ***   I'm a *male* Robin.
"but I'm not stupid and people are not stupid who think samely with me"
-- from an actual, real, non-spam mail sent to webmaster@lojban.org
http://www.lojban.org/             ***              .i cimo'o prali .ui