From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Wed Jul 02 17:17:06 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 02 Jul 2003 17:17:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 19XrmT-0003l9-00; Wed, 02 Jul 2003 17:16:57 -0700 Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 17:16:57 -0700 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Cc: Nick Nicholas Subject: [lojban] Re: {Archivist} Intention of gunma? Message-ID: <20030703001657.GL3306@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org, Nick Nicholas References: <20030702213610.GH3306@digitalkingdom.org> <5.2.0.9.0.20030702195625.03e41ec0@pop.east.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.0.20030702195625.03e41ec0@pop.east.cox.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 5800 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 08:01:07PM -0400, Robert LeChevalier wrote: > At 02:36 PM 7/2/03 -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > >Was the intention of the definition of gunma to allow things > >like: > > > > le cecmu cu gunma mi > > > >Or do we need to do things like > > > > le cecmu cu gunma lu'i mi ce da > > > >? > > > >In other words, is the x2 of gunma an individual or a set or > >either? > > Intension was probably not that specifically thought out, but > looking at the cmavo list, the definition of lu'a is more > compatible than lu'i, since it specifically mentions components of > a mass. That doesn't address the real question: is the x2 of gunma an individual or a set or either? > Of course there are probably a zillion arguments why this is > wrong, and the question should be put to byfy, which won't give > you an answer right away, but it will get on the list of issues to > be addressed. If you're saying you don't know, then yeah, it better. > (one use of request tracker that still might be appropriate for > byfy would be as a way for people to input issues like this that > need to be decided. That way requestors don't need to decide > which forum something belongs in - which should be decided by > Nick. See if he agrees.) Hey, Nick. Comments? -Robin -- Me: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. "but I'm not stupid and people are not stupid who think samely with me" -- from an actual, real, non-spam mail sent to webmaster@lojban.org http://www.lojban.org/ *** .i cimo'o prali .ui