From jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Wed Jul 02 17:46:37 2003
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 02 Jul 2003 17:46:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from web41902.mail.yahoo.com ([66.218.93.153])
	by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.12)
	id 19XsF1-0004bA-00
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 02 Jul 2003 17:46:27 -0700
Message-ID: <20030703004556.95391.qmail@web41902.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [200.69.5.23] by web41902.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 02 Jul 2003 17:45:56 PDT
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 17:45:56 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jorge "Llambías" <jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar>
Subject: [lojban] Re: {Archivist} Intention of gunma?
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
In-Reply-To: <20030702213610.GH3306@digitalkingdom.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-archive-position: 5801
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list


--- Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
> Was the intention of the definition of gunma to allow things like:
> 
>     le cecmu cu gunma mi
> 
> Or do we need to do things like
> 
>     le cecmu cu gunma lu'i mi ce da
> 
> ?

You don't need {lu'i} there because {mi ce da} is already a set.
{lu'i mi ce da} is the set whose only member is the set {mi ce da}. 
(At least that's what I think it is, but the BPFK will have to
make clarifications on how LAhE works.)

Anyway, none of that answers your question. You can find my
personal opinion on the matter here:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lojban/message/7008

(The question came up often but it never received a definitive
answer.)
 
mu'o mi'e xorxes


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com