From xod@thestonecutters.net Mon Jul 21 09:52:40 2003
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 21 Jul 2003 09:52:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [66.111.194.10] (helo=granite.thestonecutters.net)
	by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
	id 19edto-0002WQ-00
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 09:52:33 -0700
Received: from granite.thestonecutters.net (localhost.thestonecutters.net [127.0.0.1])
	by granite.thestonecutters.net (8.12.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h6LGmTVH075173
	for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 12:48:30 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from xod@thestonecutters.net)
Received: from localhost (xod@localhost)
	by granite.thestonecutters.net (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) with ESMTP id h6LGmT6T075170
	for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 12:48:29 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from xod@thestonecutters.net)
X-Authentication-Warning: granite.thestonecutters.net: xod owned process doing -bs
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 12:48:29 -0400 (EDT)
From: Invent Yourself <xod@thestonecutters.net>
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] le du (was: use of ko'a)
In-Reply-To: <007601c34fa1$f0d92f00$55350751@oemcomputer>
Message-ID: <20030721124740.U72693-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-archive-position: 5938
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: xod@thestonecutters.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

On Mon, 21 Jul 2003, And Rosta wrote:

> {le du} is a perfectly acceptable translation of "they". The question is:
> is unbound ko'a meaningless, or is it equivalent to {le du}.


How do you use le du?


-- 
The Pentagon group believed it had a visionary strategy that would
transform Iraq into an ally of Israel, remove a potential threat to the
Persian Gulf oil trade and encircle Iran with U.S. friends and allies...