From sentto-44114-20515-1059616229-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Wed Jul 30 18:54:56 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 30 Jul 2003 18:54:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from n6.grp.scd.yahoo.com ([66.218.66.90]) by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 19i2bS-0003F7-00 for lojban-in@lojban.org; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 18:51:38 -0700 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-20515-1059616229-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Received: from [66.218.66.158] by n6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 31 Jul 2003 01:51:06 -0000 X-Sender: cowan@mercury.ccil.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 14739 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2003 01:50:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m18.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 31 Jul 2003 01:50:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mercury.ccil.org) (192.190.237.100) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 31 Jul 2003 01:50:27 -0000 Received: from cowan by mercury.ccil.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19i2aJ-0001OT-00; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 21:50:27 -0400 To: And Rosta Cc: lojban@yahoogroups.com Message-ID: <20030731015027.GB3024@mercury.ccil.org> References: <013501c356f0$e4f7f120$3f3d0751@oemcomputer> In-Reply-To: <013501c356f0$e4f7f120$3f3d0751@oemcomputer> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-eGroups-From: John Cowan From: John Cowan X-Yahoo-Profile: johnwcowan MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@yahoogroups.com; contact lojban-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 21:50:27 -0400 Subject: [lojban] Re: le duX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-archive-position: 6011 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: cowan@ccil.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list And Rosta scripsit: > I had assumed that co'e ranges across all possible relations, not across > all possible grammatical selbri. But I may be wrong; it may be that co'e > is indeed the counterpart of zo'e, in which case the question was wrongly > reposed. co'e was indeed intended as a counterpart of zo'e, but I don't understand your distinction between "all possible relations" and "all possible grammatical selbri", unless it is a matter of referent and reference. -- John Cowan jcowan@reutershealth.com I am a member of a civilization. --David Brin ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Free shipping on all inkjet cartridge & refill kit orders to US & Canada. Low prices up to 80% off. We have your brand: HP, Epson, Lexmark & more. http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5510 http://us.click.yahoo.com/GHXcIA/n.WGAA/ySSFAA/GSaulB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/