From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Thu Sep 04 10:18:27 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 04 Sep 2003 10:18:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 19uxk2-0006jg-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 04 Sep 2003 10:17:54 -0700 Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 10:17:54 -0700 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: [havard@hjulstad.com: New ISO 639 language identifier - Lojban] Message-ID: <20030904171754.GA25374@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20030902153747.GB22635@mercury.ccil.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030902153747.GB22635@mercury.ccil.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 6082 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 11:37:47AM -0400, John Cowan wrote: > It's official. This identifier can be used for all RFC 3066 > purposes, including XML and HTML markup. I will request that > art-lojban, the former RFC 3066 form, be deprecated. (the identifier in question being jbo). I'm still on vacation, so I'm not going to be able to do anything with this right now besides the happy dance. 8) -Robin -- Me: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. "but I'm not stupid and people are not stupid who think samely with me" -- from an actual, real, non-spam mail sent to webmaster@lojban.org http://www.lojban.org/ *** .i cimo'o prali .ui