From pnewton@gmx.de Mon Sep 08 01:37:30 2003
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 08 Sep 2003 01:37:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from postman4.arcor-online.net ([151.189.0.189] helo=postman.arcor.de)
	by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
	id 19wHWT-0001qd-00
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 08 Sep 2003 01:37:21 -0700
Received: from hamwpne1 ([212.13.198.90])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by postman.arcor.de (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h888bGZe013921
	for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Mon, 8 Sep 2003 10:37:17 +0200 (MEST)
From: "Philip Newton" <pnewton@gmx.de>
Organization: datenrevision GmbH & Co. OHG
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 10:37:15 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [lojban] Re: toolbar
Message-ID: <3F5C5BDB.15154.377124@localhost>
Priority: normal
In-reply-to: <200309071800.05976.phma@webjockey.net>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v4.02a)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-description: Mail message body
X-archive-position: 6096
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: pnewton@gmx.de
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

On 7 Sep 2003 at 18:00, Pierre Abbat wrote:

> Which is better for "toolbar": {tcigrana} or {tcigarna}?

Does a toolbar really {grana} or {garna}? What about {tcili'i}?

(Though of the two you suggested, {tcigrana} looks more apt since the 
gi'uste has [tool] in the gloss for {garna} but [shape/form] in the 
gloss for {grana}.)

mu'o mi'e .filip.
-- 
filip.niutyn. <pnewton@gmx.de>