From ragnarok@pobox.com Sun Sep 14 08:40:23 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 14 Sep 2003 08:40:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.intrex.net ([209.42.192.250]) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19yYz1-0004HR-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 14 Sep 2003 08:40:16 -0700 Received: from craig [209.42.212.114] by smtp.intrex.net (SMTPD32-7.13) id ABC332E50060; Sun, 14 Sep 2003 11:39:47 -0400 From: "Craig" To: Subject: [lojban] Re: Text for beginners - chrestomathy part 1 Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 11:39:14 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <00a501c37ad5$1123fde0$a84279d5@oemcomputer> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 X-Declude-Sender: ragnarok@pobox.com [209.42.212.114] X-archive-position: 6154 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: ragnarok@pobox.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list >What is the relationship between Chrestomathy and BF? >Will Chrestomathy usage constrain BF? >Or will the Chrestomathy be revised to conform to BF prescription? >Or will the two be entirely independent, with Chrestomathy written in >pre-BF Lojban, but BF not required to make Chrestomathy usage licit? As a BF member, I have no intention of accepting any new documents as baselined. However, it *will* give us a significant amount of new usage. I hope that it conforms to the baseline at the time it is published - whether that is before or after we're done. Basically, the Chrestomathy is not, to my knowledge, given any official status, so it has no relationship whatsoever with the BF. -- .kreig.daniyl. "Are we adjorned? Or just completely ignoring order?" -Jordan DeLong ragnarok@pobox.com teucer@bnomic.org