From pnewton@gmx.de Tue Sep 16 05:15:30 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 16 Sep 2003 05:15:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from postman1.arcor-online.net ([151.189.0.187] helo=postman.arcor.de) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19zEjC-0007mc-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2003 05:14:42 -0700 Received: from hamwpne1 ([212.13.198.90]) (authenticated bits=0) by postman.arcor.de (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h8GCEcam018106 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2003 14:14:39 +0200 (MEST) From: "Philip Newton" Organization: datenrevision GmbH & Co. OHG To: lojban-list@lojban.org Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 14:14:37 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [lojban] Re: [cwkaiser@hotmail.com: ] Message-ID: <3F671ACD.3376.E66F8B@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <20030915181320.GJ9619@digitalkingdom.org> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v4.02a) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-description: Mail message body X-archive-position: 6184 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: pnewton@gmx.de Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On 15 Sep 2003 at 11:13, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > Anyone want to take a stab at it? The German used to be OK but was "corrected" to something ungrammatical (see footnote 19). I wonder how accurate some of the other entries are and whether it's worth submitting one in Lojban or debating how best to say it. Now that I've seen that German entry and the footnote, the page looks familiar. Did it occur on the list before? I think I even emailed the author and asked them to reinstate the original German translation, but there hasn't been a change. Hm... last updated 2002.01.05. Somehow, I doubt the solicited Lojban translation would make it there anytime soon anyway. mu'o mi'e .filip. -- filip.niutyn.