From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Tue Sep 16 17:43:06 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 16 Sep 2003 17:43:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 19zQPE-0007Qq-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2003 17:42:52 -0700 Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 17:42:52 -0700 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Conservative, *active* BPFK commissioners needed. Message-ID: <20030917004252.GK26715@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <1063755299.13448.40.camel@localhost> <001d01c37ca8$ca179940$103c0751@oemcomputer> <20030916232253.GF26715@digitalkingdom.org> <1063755299.13448.40.camel@localhost> <5.2.0.9.0.20030916203035.030390b0@pop.east.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.0.20030916203035.030390b0@pop.east.cox.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 6196 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 08:38:09PM -0400, Bob LeChevalier wrote: > At 04:55 PM 9/16/03 -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > >On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 04:35:00PM -0700, Theodore Reed wrote: > >> On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 16:22, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > >> > On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 12:18:02AM +0100, And Rosta wrote: > >> > > then those resolutions would be rather conspicuously > >> > > unconservative, it seems. I'd have thought that it would > >> > > have been enough for Robin to ask for active commissioners > >> > > with an avowed aversion to tinkering, > >> > > >> > That would be fine, yes. > >> > >> Well, I wouldn't say *avowed*, but I rather dislike tinkering, > >> unless it's to clarify something which was a little muddy > >> (gadri, for example). > > > >Bob, I hope you read that. > > How do you expect me to react to it? I'm simply pointing out that so far, of all the people I know who self-describe as conservative, *all* of them agree the gadri need to get fixed. The only person who doesn't agree is the mythical conservative you keep appealing to. > Note that Nora and I will be contributing at most minimally to the > byfy until the accounting turnover is complete, as was decided > before the byfy started. Glad to hear that. -Robin -- Me: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. "but I'm not stupid and people are not stupid who think samely with me" -- from an actual, real, non-spam mail sent to webmaster@lojban.org http://www.lojban.org/ *** .i cimo'o prali .ui