From rspeer@MIT.EDU Thu Sep 18 14:41:53 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 18 Sep 2003 14:41:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fort-point-station.mit.edu ([18.7.7.76]) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1A06X1-0004IG-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 18 Sep 2003 14:41:43 -0700 Received: from grand-central-station.mit.edu (GRAND-CENTRAL-STATION.MIT.EDU [18.7.21.82]) by fort-point-station.mit.edu (8.12.4/8.9.2) with ESMTP id h8ILff2Z001843 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2003 17:41:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from melbourne-city-street.mit.edu (MELBOURNE-CITY-STREET.MIT.EDU [18.7.21.86]) by grand-central-station.mit.edu (8.12.4/8.9.2) with ESMTP id h8ILfeAx004849 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2003 17:41:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from torg.mit.edu (TORG.MIT.EDU [18.208.0.57]) ) by melbourne-city-street.mit.edu (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id h8ILfeBY002247 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2003 17:41:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rob by torg.mit.edu with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1A06Wv-0004qB-00 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2003 17:41:37 -0400 Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 17:41:37 -0400 From: Rob Speer To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Daniel 12:4 Message-ID: <20030918214137.GC18508@mit.edu> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <1063900285.205.81518.m12@yahoogroups.com> <000201c37e16$a9fb39e0$fe7aa8c0@ONEOF> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000201c37e16$a9fb39e0$fe7aa8c0@ONEOF> X-Is-It-Not-Nifty: www.sluggy.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-archive-position: 6238 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rspeer@MIT.EDU Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 08:46:14PM +0200, Stefan 1of3 Koch wrote: > sshiskom wrote: > > "By the way, the phrase /gasnu lenu/ feels quite natural to me, > in that it parallels Korean /-ge ha/. Except that, inside NU > I cannot use /cu/, so usually I need more terminators." > > Why can't I use /cu/ inside an abstract? I was wondering too what he meant by that. You certainly can use "cu" inside of an abstraction. -- mu'o mi'e rab.spir