From jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Fri Sep 26 13:29:14 2003
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 26 Sep 2003 13:29:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from web41902.mail.yahoo.com ([66.218.93.153])
	by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.12)
	id 1A2zCa-0001oV-00
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 26 Sep 2003 13:28:32 -0700
Message-ID: <20030926202759.36984.qmail@web41902.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [200.49.74.2] by web41902.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 26 Sep 2003 13:27:59 PDT
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 13:27:59 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jorge "Llambías" <jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar>
Subject: [lojban] Re: Shakespearian word order
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
In-Reply-To: <002201c38462$eb4c1840$a2e1fea9@oemcomputer>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-archive-position: 6299
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list


la and cusku di'e
> > > > > > > xorxes:
> > > > > > > > > > > FOOL: All thy other titles thou hast given away:
> > > > > > > > > > >       That thou wast born with.
> > > > > > > > 2)   ro lo do drata noltcita do se bejdu'a zo'au ny poi do se
> > > jinzi
> > To get the unbound meaning I'd have to use an
> > explicit {tu'oboi ny} here. The only glorking is in identifying 
> > {ro lo do drata noltcita} as the antecedent, but bare {lo do drata 
> > noltcita} is not a candidate. I think.
> 
> Why is {lo do drata noltcita} not a candidate?

I'm not sure now. I guess I just took it for granted that if the 
interpretation of a pronoun as a bound variable is available, then it 
takes precedence over its interpretation as a constant.

mu'o mi'e xorxes


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.com