From pnewton@gmx.de Tue Sep 30 00:56:56 2003
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 30 Sep 2003 00:56:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from postman2.arcor-online.net ([151.189.0.188] helo=postman.arcor.de)
	by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
	id 1A4FNG-0005Ea-00
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 30 Sep 2003 00:56:46 -0700
Received: from hamwpne1 ([212.13.198.90])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by postman.arcor.de (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h8U7ugG0003944
	for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Tue, 30 Sep 2003 09:56:42 +0200 (MEST)
From: "Philip Newton" <pnewton@gmx.de>
Organization: datenrevision GmbH & Co. OHG
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 09:56:41 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [lojban] Re: Closings of letters
Message-ID: <3F795359.9446.292396@localhost>
Priority: normal
In-reply-to: <20030930010446.GA36778@allusion.net>
References: <200309291803.34656.phma@webjockey.net>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v4.02a)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-description: Mail message body
X-archive-position: 6320
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: pnewton@gmx.de
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

On 29 Sep 2003 at 20:04, Jordan DeLong wrote:

> I'd just replace them all with "mu'omi'e".

So would I. (Or co'omi'e, but mu'omi'e is indeed better, since you 
general expect a response to a letter.)

mu'o mi'e .filip.
-- 
filip.niutyn. <pnewton@gmx.de>