From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Mon Oct 06 17:07:40 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 06 Oct 2003 17:07:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.22) id 1A6fNk-0003yr-92 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2003 17:07:16 -0700 Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 17:07:16 -0700 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Language evolution Message-ID: <20031007000716.GZ1970@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20031007000135.GX1970@digitalkingdom.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031007000135.GX1970@digitalkingdom.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 6349 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 05:01:35PM -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > A language that conveyed all information unambiguously, say Ferrer > i Cancho and Sol?, would have a separate word for every thing, > concept or action it referred to. Such a language would be > formidably complicated for the speaker: the green of grass, for > example, would be represented by a totally different word to the > green of sea, an emerald or an oak leaf. Sorry. If I had read this paragraph before I sent it here, I wouldn't have bothered. What utter tripe. -Robin -- Me: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. "but I'm not stupid and people are not stupid who think samely with me" -- from an actual, real, non-spam mail sent to webmaster@lojban.org http://www.lojban.org/ *** .i cimo'o prali .ui