From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Thu Oct 16 13:22:23 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 16 Oct 2003 13:22:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.22) id 1AAEdE-0000JB-U3 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 13:22:00 -0700 Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 13:22:00 -0700 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: {Archivist} Intention of gunma? Message-ID: <20031016202200.GB1016@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20030703004556.95391.qmail@web41902.mail.yahoo.com> <20030702213610.GH3306@digitalkingdom.org> <20030703004556.95391.qmail@web41902.mail.yahoo.com> <5.2.0.9.0.20031016144431.03358320@pop.east.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.0.20031016144431.03358320@pop.east.cox.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 6448 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 02:50:54PM -0400, Bob LeChevalier wrote: > At 04:39 PM 10/15/03 -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > The "intent" (however sloppy) was > > le cecmu cu gunma mi joi da (unless I am the only component of the mass). > > but I believe current thinking would make it > > le cecmu cu gunma mi ce da My question was, can argument 2 be incompletely specified? -Robni -- Me: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. "Constant neocortex override is the only thing that stops us all from running out and eating all the cookies." -- Eliezer Yudkowsky http://www.lojban.org/ *** .i cimo'o prali .ui