From pnewton@gmx.de Mon Nov 03 05:40:39 2003
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 03 Nov 2003 05:40:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from postman2.arcor-online.net ([151.189.0.188] helo=postman.arcor.de)
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22)
	id 1AGewa-0006oW-IP
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 03 Nov 2003 05:40:32 -0800
Received: from hamwpne1 ([212.13.198.90])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by postman.arcor.de (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hA3DeSgj012321
	for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 14:40:29 +0100 (MET)
From: "Philip Newton" <pnewton@gmx.de>
Organization: datenrevision GmbH & Co. OHG
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 14:40:22 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [lojban] Re: Implied sumti ordering
Message-ID: <3FA668D6.11529.DB7D45@localhost>
Priority: normal
In-reply-to: <bo5kav+qahp@eGroups.com>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v4.02a)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-description: Mail message body
X-archive-position: 6542
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: pnewton@gmx.de
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

On 3 Nov 2003 at 13:14, Mr Ekted wrote:

> I realize there are other ways to say this like:
> 
> mi citka le rectu
> fe le rectu cu citka fa mi
> le rectu se citka mi

The third should be {le rectu cu se citka mi}, otherwise you simply 
have two sumti, {le rectu se citka} and {mi}, and no selbri.

mu'o mi'e .filip.
-- 
filip.niutyn. <pnewton@gmx.de>