From jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Fri Nov 07 15:24:46 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 07 Nov 2003 15:24:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from web41902.mail.yahoo.com ([66.218.93.153]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.22) id 1AIFlB-0004Dz-BN for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 07 Nov 2003 15:11:21 -0800 Message-ID: <20031107231047.27542.qmail@web41902.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.69.6.49] by web41902.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 07 Nov 2003 15:10:47 PST Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 15:10:47 -0800 (PST) From: Jorge "Llambías" Subject: [lojban] Re: Question on "ro" To: lojban-list@lojban.org In-Reply-To: <000201c3a4fe$270e4180$fe7aa8c0@ONEOF> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-archive-position: 6602 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list --- "Stefan \"1of3\" Koch" wrote: > coi. > > Some time ago there was a discussion on this list whether "ro" is importing > or not. I wasn't able to follow the discussion at that time since I didn't > have enough knowledge of logics. > > By now I am a student of math (and Latin but that doesn't matter here) and I > can see the problem. I just don't know what the result of the discussion > was. I don't want to start the discussion all over again but I want to know > whether any consensus was found. > > ki'e mu'omi'e ctefan. You may or may not find the answer here: :) http://www.lojban.org/tiki/tiki-index.php?page=quantification+and+the+meaning+of+ro mu'o mi'e xorxes __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree