From sentto-44114-21123-1068489077-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Mon Nov 10 10:31:23 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 10 Nov 2003 10:31:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from n16.grp.scd.yahoo.com ([66.218.66.71]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.22) id 1AJGon-00056Y-5t for lojban-in@lojban.org; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 10:31:17 -0800 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-21123-1068489077-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Received: from [66.218.66.160] by n16.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Nov 2003 18:31:17 -0000 X-Sender: hfroark@bigmailbox.net X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 56120 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2003 18:31:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.166) by m20.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 10 Nov 2003 18:31:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO n6.grp.scd.yahoo.com) (66.218.66.90) by mta5.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 Nov 2003 18:31:13 -0000 Received: from [66.218.66.122] by n6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Nov 2003 18:31:09 -0000 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20031110180636.GC4521@digitalkingdom.org> User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82 X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster From: "hfroark" X-Originating-IP: 66.218.66.90 X-Yahoo-Profile: hfroark MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@yahoogroups.com; contact lojban-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 18:31:08 -0000 Subject: [lojban] Re: Difference in gismu and rafsi lists Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-archive-position: 6620 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: hfroark@bigmailbox.net Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list --- In lojban@yahoogroups.com, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 06:03:52PM -0000, hfroark wrote: >> In the document >> http://www.lojban.org/publications/wordlists/gismu.txt , the cmavo >> "zi'o" is listed with rafsi "zil". In the document >> http://www.lojban.org/publications/wordlists/rafsi.txt , neither >> the >> rafsi "zil" nor the cmavo "zi'o" is listed at all. >> >> Can I assume that the cmavo "zi'o" has the rafsi "zil"? > >Yes. The rafsi list has only gismu rafsi, IIRC. No, it has pairs such as "biv" -> "bi", "dav" -> "da", "doi" -> "do". Also, I processed them both with perl as preparation for a programming project I am working on. The difference just described was the only difference in the rafsi to gismu mapping. ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark Printer at MyInks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & Canada. http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511 http://us.click.yahoo.com/mOAaAA/3exGAA/qnsNAA/GSaulB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/