From treed@surreality.us Thu Nov 13 20:27:50 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 13 Nov 2003 20:27:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from 68-234-38-146.anhmca.adelphia.net ([68.234.38.146] helo=home.surreality.us) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1AKVYg-00025D-9E for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 13 Nov 2003 20:27:46 -0800 Received: from ben ([192.168.8.42]) by home.surreality.us with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AKVYI-0004NT-00 for ; Thu, 13 Nov 2003 20:27:22 -0800 From: "Theo Reed" To: Subject: [lojban] Re: cfari Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 20:27:08 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 In-Reply-To: <20031114005434.GL15718@digitalkingdom.org> Thread-Index: AcOqSs9g8nXN6BbHS2uXBRzCW0hxsAAHGYPw Message-Id: X-archive-position: 6666 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: treed@surreality.us Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list > coi itself is the *only* word I've seen get used properly in > COI that I can recall. I've seen ju'I (never mind the capital I there... Outlook has decided that it knows better than I) used on IRC quite a bit, I've also seen re'ipei. -- Ted