From jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Fri Nov 14 04:37:18 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 14 Nov 2003 04:37:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from web41905.mail.yahoo.com ([66.218.93.156]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.22) id 1AKdCK-0000Rs-Vv for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 14 Nov 2003 04:37:13 -0800 Message-ID: <20031114123717.81020.qmail@web41905.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.49.74.2] by web41905.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 14 Nov 2003 04:37:17 PST Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 04:37:17 -0800 (PST) From: Jorge "Llambías" Subject: [lojban] Re: COI, UI (was Re: cfari) To: lojban-list@lojban.org In-Reply-To: <20031114015006.GA44534@allusion.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-archive-position: 6669 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list --- Jordan DeLong wrote: > > Many people who use lerfu sumti almost never get the boi terminator > right. But this doesn't argue in favor of changing the multi-letter > rule for lerfu anaphor. I wouldn't change the multi-letter rule, but I would change the mixed-letter/number rule. The more difficult boi's to remember are when quantifying a lerfu pronoun: {reboi cy}, not {re cy}, and when a lerfu pronoun is followed by a quantified sumti or a number tense: {abuboi za'ure'u cusku}, not {abu za'ure'u cusku}. I don't see numbers containing letters or lerfu strings with numbers used much or at all. It would be better to have to add glue for those rather than forcing boi in the above situations. mu'o mi'e xorxes __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree