From sentto-44114-21228-1069117630-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Mon Nov 17 17:05:46 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 17 Nov 2003 17:05:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from n23.grp.scd.yahoo.com ([66.218.66.79]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.22) id 1ALuJJ-0007y2-9r for lojban-in@lojban.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 17:05:41 -0800 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-21228-1069117630-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Received: from [66.218.66.160] by n23.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 18 Nov 2003 01:07:20 -0000 X-Sender: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 76513 invoked from network); 18 Nov 2003 01:07:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m20.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 18 Nov 2003 01:07:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO n10.grp.scd.yahoo.com) (66.218.66.65) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 18 Nov 2003 01:07:08 -0000 Received: from [66.218.66.120] by n10.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 18 Nov 2003 01:07:07 -0000 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.0.20031117152400.03640ec0@pop.east.cox.net> User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82 X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster From: "jjllambias2000" X-Originating-IP: 66.218.66.65 X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@yahoogroups.com; contact lojban-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 01:07:07 -0000 Subject: [lojban] Re: {Archivist} niltei? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-archive-position: 6725 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list --- In lojban@yahoogroups.com, Bob LeChevalier wrote: > At 10:45 PM 11/16/03 -0800, Robin wrote: > > > >Anyways, the theory here is that you can do > > > > li muno cu niltei lo nanca le mi mivytei > > > >for "I am 50 years old", right? > > That was the theory, whether people choose to accept it or not %^) I'm > equally amenable to dropping the x2 in favor of lo nanca be li muno for > x1. The point was to distinguish the interval from its measurement. The interval goes in the x1 of nanca, and the measurement in x2, right? The double meaning of ni shows in that you are equally happy with either for the x1 of ni. Since you can say {le mi mivytei cu nanca li muno}, it is not clear what {niltei} adds. mu'o mi'e xorxes ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark Printer at MyInks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & Canada. http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511 http://us.click.yahoo.com/mOAaAA/3exGAA/qnsNAA/GSaulB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/