From sentto-44114-21299-1069812675-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Tue Nov 25 18:11:54 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 25 Nov 2003 18:11:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from n4.grp.scd.yahoo.com ([66.218.66.88]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.22) id 1AOp9g-0007tM-L9 for lojban-in@lojban.org; Tue, 25 Nov 2003 18:11:48 -0800 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-21299-1069812675-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Received: from [66.218.67.195] by n4.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 26 Nov 2003 02:11:16 -0000 X-Sender: MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 12666 invoked from network); 26 Nov 2003 02:11:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 26 Nov 2003 02:11:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-r08.mx.aol.com) (152.163.225.104) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 26 Nov 2003 02:11:15 -0000 Received: from MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com by imo-r08.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v36_r1.1.) id r.d3.258e5361 (4116) for ; Tue, 25 Nov 2003 21:11:09 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-Mailer: 6.0 sub 12 X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 152.163.225.104 From: MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com X-Yahoo-Profile: lojbaner MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@yahoogroups.com; contact lojban-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 21:11:09 EST Subject: [lojban] element names Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_d3.258e5361.2cf565bd_boundary" X-archive-position: 6796 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list --part1_d3.258e5361.2cf565bd_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 2003-11-25 2:24:14 PM Eastern Standard Time, lojban@yahoogroups.com writes: > I actually would expect elements to be fu'ivla; they seem to be an > obvious place for them. Or possibly lujvo based on atomic weight. i would use atomic number instead of atomic weight, saving atomic weight to distinguish between isotopes. stevo --part1_d3.258e5361.2cf565bd_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 2003-11-25 2:24:14 PM Eastern Standard Time, lojban@yahoogroups.com writes:


I actually would expect elements to be fu'ivla; they seem to be an
obvious place for them.  Or possibly lujvo based on atomic weight.
i would use atomic number instead of atomic weight, saving atomic weight to distinguish between isotopes.
stevo
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
click here

To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
--part1_d3.258e5361.2cf565bd_boundary--