From jerome@desquilbet.org Sat Nov 29 14:50:31 2003
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 29 Nov 2003 14:50:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp4.wanadoo.fr ([193.252.22.27] helo=mwinf0404.wanadoo.fr)
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22)
	id 1AQDv0-0001t5-Ks
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 29 Nov 2003 14:50:26 -0800
Received: from [81.48.151.158] (ASt-Lambert-106-1-2-158.w81-48.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.48.151.158])
	by mwinf0404.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 117EB38000E3
	for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Sat, 29 Nov 2003 23:49:55 +0100 (CET)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v606)
In-Reply-To: <20031119231250.4866.qmail@web41902.mail.yahoo.com>
References: <20031119231250.4866.qmail@web41902.mail.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Message-Id: <58732EBE-22BE-11D8-BC61-003065E00134@desquilbet.org>
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=E9r=F4me_Desquilbet?= <jerome@desquilbet.org>
Subject: [lojban] Sir (was: "Tintin - L'Ile Noire" in Lojban)
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 23:49:53 +0100
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.606)
X-archive-position: 6810
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: jerome@desquilbet.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

>> 6.
>> le barpre: ti vanci sanmi doi do'u
>
> What's a good vocative for "Sir"? {doi prenu}? {doi nobli}? {doi do 
> io}?
> {doi do ga'inai}? Is {doi do'u} better than {doi do}?

I think using {.io} is a very good idea. What about {doi.iodo}?