From phma@ixazon.dynip.com Sun Nov 30 17:53:36 2003
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 30 Nov 2003 17:53:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 208-150-110-21-adsl.precisionet.net ([208.150.110.21] helo=blackcat.ixazon.lan)
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22)
	id 1AQdFj-0003YT-79
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 17:53:31 -0800
Received: by blackcat.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id BF2734E36; Mon,  1 Dec 2003 01:52:58 +0000 (UTC)
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@webjockey.net>
Organization: dis
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] fu'ivla rafsi and r-hyphens
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 20:52:57 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200311302052.57963.phma@webjockey.net>
X-archive-position: 6826
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: phma@webjockey.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

In the CCVVCV fu'ivla rafsi proposal, if a CVV rafsi precedes a fu'ivla rafsi, 
is an r-hyphen needed?

phma
-- 
.i toljundi do .ibabo mi'afra tu'a do
.ibabo damba do .ibabo do jinga
.icu'u la ma'atman.