From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Mon Feb 09 16:52:14 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 09 Feb 2004 16:52:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.30) id 1AqM8H-0005q1-PO for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2004 16:52:09 -0800 Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 16:52:09 -0800 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Status of morphology commission? Message-ID: <20040210005209.GQ8463@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <200402091751.21409.phma@webjockey.net> <20040209194328.GI1600@digitalkingdom.org> <200402091751.21409.phma@webjockey.net> <5.2.0.9.0.20040209190345.030d7700@pop.east.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.0.20040209190345.030d7700@pop.east.cox.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 7067 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 07:09:03PM -0500, Bob LeChevalier wrote: > At 03:40 PM 2/9/04 -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > >Please note that I wasn't just asking your (IIRC Nora is also on > >that committee) and that I wasn't asking about valfendi. > > Nora may answer on her own, but if she doesn't, I will remind you > that she like me has not done any work on anything byfy related > during the past year due to our "higher calling" to do accounting > that recently ended. I'm sorry; I keep forgetting about that. :-( -Robin -- Me: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. "Constant neocortex override is the only thing that stops us all from running out and eating all the cookies." -- Eliezer Yudkowsky http://www.lojban.org/ *** .i cimo'o prali .ui