From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Tue Feb 10 18:10:46 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 10 Feb 2004 18:10:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.30) id 1Aqjpo-00019f-9S; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 18:10:40 -0800 Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 18:10:40 -0800 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Cc: jbofihe@go.to Subject: [lojban] Re: jbofihe or book error? Message-ID: <20040211021040.GG8463@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org, jbofihe@go.to References: <20040211011813.GD8463@digitalkingdom.org> <20040211012538.GE8463@digitalkingdom.org> <20040211015346.GC9112@ccil.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040211015346.GC9112@ccil.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 7084 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 08:53:46PM -0500, John Cowan wrote: > Robin Lee Powell scripsit: > > > Anyone know what the correct sentence would be? > > The termset_85 rule makes it clear that the first (unbracketed) > "nu'u" in 14.15.9 doesn't belong there, and is causing the error. > Removing it will cause the sentence to parse. This is of course > not the same as saying it's *correct*. OK. You wrote the book; what's necessary to make it 'correct'? It is worth noting that the resulting sentence, la djan. fa'u la frank. cusku nu'i bau la lojban. fa'u bai la djordj. does *not* parse in jbofihe. -Robin -- Me: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. "Constant neocortex override is the only thing that stops us all from running out and eating all the cookies." -- Eliezer Yudkowsky http://www.lojban.org/ *** .i cimo'o prali .ui