From jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Wed Feb 11 04:42:52 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 11 Feb 2004 04:42:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from web41901.mail.yahoo.com ([66.218.93.152]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.30) id 1AqthX-0002hU-1W for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 04:42:47 -0800 Message-ID: <20040211124207.43220.qmail@web41901.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.49.74.2] by web41901.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 04:42:07 PST Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 04:42:07 -0800 (PST) From: Jorge "Llambías" Subject: [lojban] Re: jbofihe or book error? To: lojban-list@lojban.org In-Reply-To: <20040211011813.GD8463@digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-archive-position: 7086 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list --- Robin Lee Powell wrote: > In http://lojban.org/publications/reference_grammar/chapter14.html, > ex. 15.9 does not parse with jbofihe. > > I can find nothing in BookErrata on the Wiki. Is it the book or > jbofihe? > > (I'd work it out myself, but I don't have time, and like everyone > else I don't understand termsets). The correct sentence corresponding to the English is: nu'i ge la djan. bau la lojban. [nu'u] gi la frank. bai la djordj. [nu'u] cusku Or {joi gi} instead of {ge}, given that the text is about non-logical connectives. It is not clear what distinction is 15.9 supposed to make with respect to 15.8. mu'o mi'e xorxes __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online. http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html