From jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Wed Feb 11 04:59:39 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 11 Feb 2004 04:59:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from web41902.mail.yahoo.com ([66.218.93.153]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.30) id 1Aqtxm-0002vf-G1 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 04:59:34 -0800 Message-ID: <20040211125903.58441.qmail@web41902.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.49.74.2] by web41902.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 04:59:03 PST Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 04:59:03 -0800 (PST) From: Jorge "Llambías" Subject: [lojban] Re: jbofihe or book error? To: lojban-list@lojban.org In-Reply-To: <20040211124207.43220.qmail@web41901.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-archive-position: 7088 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list --- Jorge Llambías wrote: > --- Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > In http://lojban.org/publications/reference_grammar/chapter14.html, > > ex. 15.9 does not parse with jbofihe. > > The correct sentence corresponding to the English is: > > nu'i ge la djan. bau la lojban. [nu'u] > gi la frank. bai la djordj. [nu'u] cusku > > Or {joi gi} instead of {ge}, given that the text is about > non-logical connectives. It is not clear what distinction is > 15.9 supposed to make with respect to 15.8. I think the original intention might have been something like: do fa'u mi cusku nu'i fa'u gi fi la djan. bau la lojban. [nu'u] gi fi la frank. bai la djordj. [nu'u] You and I speak, to John in Lojban, and to Frank compelled by George, respectively. That example could fit better with the text. mu'o mi'e xorxes __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online. http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html