From jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Wed Feb 11 10:18:47 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 11 Feb 2004 10:18:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from web41906.mail.yahoo.com ([66.218.93.157]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.30) id 1Aqywc-0007Sn-OH for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 10:18:42 -0800 Message-ID: <20040211181812.82328.qmail@web41906.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.49.74.2] by web41906.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 10:18:12 PST Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 10:18:12 -0800 (PST) From: Jorge "Llambías" Subject: [lojban] Re: Another book wierdness. To: lojban-list@lojban.org In-Reply-To: <20040211175428.GQ8463@digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-archive-position: 7093 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list --- Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > Since you seem to understand this stuff, xorxes (or anyone else who > wants to jump in), what I really need is a sentence where dropping > nu'u causes a failure to parse. Not just an unintended meaning, but > actual non-parseability. Try this one: nu'i ge mi lo nu cusku bau nu'u gi do da nelci without {nu'u} it breaks down and it can't recover, because the error appears only at {do}. There are better alternative terminators to use there instead of nu'u, though: {ku}, {kei}, and {vau}, in order of decreasing preference. (I only understand this stuff in the sense that I can read the EBNF grammar, but I can't really use them fluently. I never remember, for instance, whether {nu'i} is supposed to go before or after {ge}.) mu'o mi'e xorxes __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online. http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html