From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Wed Feb 11 10:28:46 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 11 Feb 2004 10:28:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.30) id 1Aqz6H-0007Yg-IY for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 10:28:41 -0800 Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 10:28:41 -0800 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Another book wierdness. Message-ID: <20040211182841.GS8463@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20040211175428.GQ8463@digitalkingdom.org> <20040211181812.82328.qmail@web41906.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040211181812.82328.qmail@web41906.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 7094 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 10:18:12AM -0800, Jorge Llamb?as wrote: > > --- Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > > > Since you seem to understand this stuff, xorxes (or anyone else > > who wants to jump in), what I really need is a sentence where > > dropping nu'u causes a failure to parse. Not just an unintended > > meaning, but actual non-parseability. > > Try this one: > > nu'i ge mi lo nu cusku bau nu'u gi do da nelci Yep, that's the case where my new version has nu'u being absolutely required. Any other cases? I couldn't find any. -Robin -- Me: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. "Constant neocortex override is the only thing that stops us all from running out and eating all the cookies." -- Eliezer Yudkowsky http://www.lojban.org/ *** .i cimo'o prali .ui