From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Wed Mar 17 22:31:08 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 17 Mar 2004 22:31:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.30) id 1B3r3X-00089R-4e for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 22:31:03 -0800 Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 22:31:03 -0800 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Official parser problem? Message-ID: <20040318063103.GU11847@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20040317222428.GZ11847@digitalkingdom.org> <20040318031344.GF12076@ccil.org> <20040318052608.GS11847@digitalkingdom.org> <200403180119.08754.phma@webjockey.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200403180119.08754.phma@webjockey.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 7250 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 01:19:08AM -0500, Pierre Abbat wrote: > On Thursday 18 March 2004 00:26, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > My goal is to produce a completely formalized grammar for Lojban > > (*including* the morphology) that has no pre-processor at all[2] and > > encodes something close enough to the current grammar as to > > invalidate no existing usage. > > I have 144KB of morphology test cases, including some corner cases > (e.g. {micytosmabru} vs. {mictosmarbu}). Would you like it now, or can > you wait for the next valfendi release? I would like to wait. Remind me again if necessary. Thank you. -Robin -- Me: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. "Constant neocortex override is the only thing that stops us all from running out and eating all the cookies." -- Eliezer Yudkowsky http://www.lojban.org/ *** .i cimo'o prali .ui