From jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Wed Mar 24 20:30:16 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 24 Mar 2004 20:30:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from web41906.mail.yahoo.com ([66.218.93.157]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.30) id 1B6MVO-0007ye-Mi for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 20:30:10 -0800 Message-ID: <20040324212300.10559.qmail@web41906.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.49.74.2] by web41906.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 13:23:00 PST Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 13:23:00 -0800 (PST) From: Jorge "Llambías" Subject: [lojban] Re: grammar oddity challenge To: Craig , lojban-list@lojban.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-archive-position: 7314 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list --- Craig wrote: > >> On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 02:00:04PM -0800, Jorge Llamb?as wrote: > > > >The answer I had in mind was any brivla of > >the form {zei zei }. > > Is that even a brivla? Because, technically, it doesn't valsi. If it is, it is indeed a boundary case. It is a brivla at least in parser terms: "a. Token sequences of the form any - (ZEI - any) ..., where there may be any number of ZEIs, are merged into a single token of selma'o BRIVLA." Also, for example in the rule lerfu-word = BY | any-word BU {zei zei lujvo} is a case of "any-word". So {zei zei lujvo bu} (but only at the beginning of text!) is a lerfu-word. mu'o mi'e xorxes __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time. http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html