From jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Fri Mar 26 15:10:45 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 26 Mar 2004 15:10:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from web41905.mail.yahoo.com ([66.218.93.156]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.30) id 1B70TH-0007Kt-Mv for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 15:10:39 -0800 Message-ID: <20040326231005.86727.qmail@web41905.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.69.6.48] by web41905.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 15:10:05 PST Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 15:10:05 -0800 (PST) From: Jorge "Llambías" Subject: [lojban] Re: fi'u was Re:lanzu usage To: lojban-list@lojban.org In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.0.20040326170952.030ea920@pop.east.cox.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-archive-position: 7352 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list --- Bob LeChevalier wrote: > I never considered the use of boi to be that problematical, especially > since it can be required sometimes even with pure numbers (JCB's classic > example was "five 55-gallon drums"). I experienced it quite often. I only realized half way through the alice translation that a lot of abu's had to be abuboi's. I also notice that it is a very common mistake. People just tend to quantify BY pronouns like normal sumti. mu'o mi'e xorxes __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time. http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html