From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Sun Mar 28 10:13:05 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 28 Mar 2004 10:13:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.30) id 1B7emJ-0002i1-WB for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 10:12:59 -0800 Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 10:12:59 -0800 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Onomatopoeia (err, sp?) Message-ID: <20040328181259.GC6569@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 7367 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 12:48:06PM -0500, Craig wrote: > >> Please point out that a cmavo is non-standard when you use it, and > >> point people to the definition. > > It's bloody obvious it's not standard when you see three vowels... To whom? I had a discussion on IRC yesterday with someone who needed cmavo defined three times in the space of less than an hour. Not to insult that person, of course, just pointing out that 'obvious' is in the eye of the beholder. -Robin -- Me: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. "Constant neocortex override is the only thing that stops us all from running out and eating all the cookies." -- Eliezer Yudkowsky http://www.lojban.org/ *** .i cimo'o prali .ui