From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Mon Mar 29 15:04:42 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 29 Mar 2004 15:04:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.30) id 1B85o5-0000WO-8c for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 15:04:37 -0800 Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 15:04:37 -0800 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: "pu" versus "pu ku" and LR(1) Message-ID: <20040329230437.GT6569@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20040329070110.GO6569@digitalkingdom.org> <20040329120955.GB16482@ccil.org> <20040329200059.GR6569@digitalkingdom.org> <20040329222254.GJ8898@skunk.reutershealth.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040329222254.GJ8898@skunk.reutershealth.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 7394 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 05:22:54PM -0500, jcowan@reutershealth.com wrote: > Now in #3 and #4 the ordering is the same as in #1 and #2 > respectively, and presumably #3 = #1 and #4 = #2. However, #3 and #4 > use tenses on the selbri rather than free-floating tense+KU. If we > apply the selbri-NA vs. NAKU rules, then #3 = #2 because the tense > moves to the front of the prenex (outermost loop). *Ick*. OK, but no-one's sure what is actually supposed to be true in the current language WRT this issue. Hmmm. May not be relevant; I'm going to respond to your original post again. -Robin -- Me: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. "Constant neocortex override is the only thing that stops us all from running out and eating all the cookies." -- Eliezer Yudkowsky http://www.lojban.org/ *** .i cimo'o prali .ui