From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Sun Apr 04 18:17:25 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 04 Apr 2004 18:17:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.30) id 1BAIjn-0000qo-NU for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 04 Apr 2004 18:17:19 -0700 Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2004 18:17:19 -0700 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: The strange case of "le me by moi" Message-ID: <20040405011719.GF23652@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20040404222303.GD23652@digitalkingdom.org> <200404041950.52120.phma@webjockey.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200404041950.52120.phma@webjockey.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 7432 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Sun, Apr 04, 2004 at 06:50:52PM -0500, Pierre Abbat wrote: > On Sunday 04 April 2004 18:23, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > A sentence including a construct like > > > > le me by moi > > > > appears in Alice. I have no idea what it means. > > It means "the one belonging to by". Seems like you didn't take 'moi' into account, unless you mean "the first belonging to by"? -Robin -- Me: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. "Constant neocortex override is the only thing that stops us all from running out and eating all the cookies." -- Eliezer Yudkowsky http://www.lojban.org/ *** .i cimo'o prali .ui