From jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Tue Apr 06 15:36:00 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 06 Apr 2004 15:36:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web41901.mail.yahoo.com ([66.218.93.152]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BAzAg-0006W5-Tv for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2004 15:35:54 -0700 Message-ID: <20040406223524.68628.qmail@web41901.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.69.6.38] by web41901.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2004 15:35:24 PDT Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2004 15:35:24 -0700 (PDT) From: Jorge "Llambías" Subject: [lojban] Re: Opinions on "mi viska le sa .i mi cusku zo .djan." To: lojban-list@lojban.org In-Reply-To: <20040406215825.GS5197@digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-archive-position: 7464 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list --- Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 02:54:04PM -0700, Jorge Llamb?as wrote: > > (You usually won't need {me'u} there.) Modification of names with > > brivla I would class as everyday speech, yes. > > I'm *fairly* certain I've chatted in Lojban more often than you (as > you've never been on IRC). I do not remember ever having need of that > kind of construction. I'm sure you've chatted in Lojban more often than me, but isn't "never" a bit exaggerated, given that we have chatted in Lojban together more than a few times? I'm not saying you can't get around it, but if the construction was available, it would probably be used, unlike other constructions that are available but never used. mu'o mi'e xorxes __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/