From adam@pubcrawler.org Wed Apr 07 12:58:48 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 07 Apr 2004 12:58:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from postal.seas.wustl.edu ([128.252.21.102]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BBJC5-0001LZ-Ex for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 07 Apr 2004 12:58:42 -0700 Received: from clarion.cec.wustl.edu (clarion.cec.wustl.edu [128.252.21.3]) by postal.seas.wustl.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i37Juvd03357 for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2004 14:56:58 -0500 Received: from localhost (adam@localhost) by clarion.cec.wustl.edu (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id i37JwZ9l011875 for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2004 14:58:36 -0500 (CDT) X-Authentication-Warning: clarion.cec.wustl.edu: adam owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 14:58:35 -0500 (CDT) From: "Adam D. Lopresto" To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] [OT] dai In-Reply-To: <20040406004438.53530.qmail@web41902.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: References: <20040406004438.53530.qmail@web41902.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=X-UNKNOWN Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Status: No, -4.6 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Report: -4.6/5.0 ---- Start SpamAssassin results -4.60 points, 5 required; * -0.0 -- Has a valid-looking References header * 0.0 -- Message-Id indicates a non-spam MUA (Pine) * -0.4 -- Has a X-Authentication-Warning header * -0.4 -- Has a In-Reply-To header * -0.5 -- BODY: Contains what looks like an email attribution * 0.0 -- BODY: {1}Letter - garbage - {4}Letter * 0.6 -- BODY: {1}Letter - punctuation - {4}Letter * 0.0 -- BODY: {2}Letter - garbage - {1}Letter * 0.6 -- BODY: {2}Letter - punctuation - {1}Letter * 0.0 -- BODY: {4}Letter - garbage - {1}Letter * 0.6 -- BODY: {4}Letter - punctuation - {1}Letter * -4.7 -- BODY: Bayesian classifier says spam probability is 10 to 20% [score: 0.1775] * -0.4 -- BODY: Contains what looks like a quoted email text * 0.0 -- Reply with quoted text ---- End of SpamAssassin results X-archive-position: 7490 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: adam@pubcrawler.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Jorge Llambías wrote: > Here's the original: > > @c `You ought to be ashamed of yourself,' said Alice, `a great > @c girl like you,' (she might well say this), `to go on crying in > @c this way! > > i lu ei do ckeji sei la alis cusku i do barda nixli tosa'a ju'o drani toi > i i'enai ca'o tai klaku Should that be {eidai} instead of {ei}, or am I not understanding correctly? That's meant as an honest question, since I'm still not entirely clear on the meaning of {dai}. -- Adam Lopresto http://cec.wustl.edu/~adam/ "There was a boy called Eustace Clarence Scrubb, and he almost deserved it." -- C. S. Lewis, "The Chronicles of Narnia"