From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Tue Apr 13 11:53:43 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 13 Apr 2004 11:53:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.30) id 1BDT2M-0002fJ-KB for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 11:53:34 -0700 Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 11:53:34 -0700 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: On parser extensions. Message-ID: <20040413185334.GM21966@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20040413164011.GK21966@digitalkingdom.org> <20040413172212.75258.qmail@web41904.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040413172212.75258.qmail@web41904.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 7540 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 10:22:12AM -0700, Jorge Llamb?as wrote: > > --- Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > xorxes pointed out that "pabi'ipazeva'e" is currently not grammatical, > > whether you shove all the words together or not. :-) The reason seems > > to be that the current parsers don't wait long enough, and try to > > interpret things as "le pa bi'i ". > [snip] > So I don't see how it manages to get a {bi'i} in there. It doesn't; my parser does in fact choke on the example sentence. Sorry, my bad. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. "Many philosophical problems are caused by such things as the simple inability to shut up." -- David Stove, liberally paraphrased. http://www.lojban.org/ *** loi pimlu na srana .i ti rokci morsi