From jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Fri Apr 30 17:01:30 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 30 Apr 2004 17:01:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web41905.mail.yahoo.com ([66.218.93.156]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.31) id 1BJhwX-0005Jq-TC for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 17:01:22 -0700 Message-ID: <20040501000051.64666.qmail@web41905.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.69.6.34] by web41905.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 17:00:51 PDT Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 17:00:51 -0700 (PDT) From: Jorge "Llambías" Subject: [lojban] Re: Why capital letters standing in for letterals is a *bad* idea. To: lojban-list@lojban.org In-Reply-To: <20040430234940.GF14939@digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-archive-position: 7610 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list --- Robin Lee Powell wrote: > I strongly prefer it over capitalizing only the vowel, as I've stated in > the past. My order of preference, from worst to best is: la DJENifer la DJEnifer la djEnifer la djénifer la djenifer i.e., I prefer that the name be fully adapted, but if they insist on the unusual stress then mark it with the least intrusive method. mu'o mi'e xorxes __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/careermakeover