From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Sat May 01 10:05:30 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 01 May 2004 10:05:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.31) id 1BJxvX-0001oD-Pa for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 01 May 2004 10:05:23 -0700 Date: Sat, 1 May 2004 10:05:23 -0700 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: zei + zoi ? Message-ID: <20040501170523.GM14939@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20040501075819.GL14939@digitalkingdom.org> <20040501134327.85085.qmail@web41902.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040501134327.85085.qmail@web41902.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 7621 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Sat, May 01, 2004 at 06:43:27AM -0700, Jorge Llamb?as wrote: > > --- Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > Both jbofie and the official parser accept > > > > le zoi ibu cgi-bin ibu zei samselpla > > That's right. {i bu} is not a word, so you have: > > {le zoi i bu cgi-bin i bu zei samselpla}, which means the > same as {le bu zei samselpla pe zoi i bu cgi-bin i}. > The preparser will deal first with zoi, then with zei > and only then with bu, if they had not been swallowed. Ah! My parser does The Right Thing if the sentence is given to it as "le zoi i bu cgi-bin i bu zei samselpla" (the pre-processor doesn't understand Lojban at all, so it needs the spacing for zoi to work properly). Thanks. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. "Many philosophical problems are caused by such things as the simple inability to shut up." -- David Stove, liberally paraphrased. http://www.lojban.org/ *** loi pimlu na srana .i ti rokci morsi